Pollution 'putting millions of children at brain damage risk'
--
The Times -- By David Rose -- Millions of children throughout
the world may have suffered brain damage as a result of industrial
pollution, researchers say. --
November 8, 2006
*Common pollutants may be causing a "silent pandemic" of
neurodevelopmental disorders by impairing the brain development of
foetuses and infants, scientists writing today in
The
Lancet medical journal say. *
Potential effects of exposure to even tiny amounts of toxic
chemicals include lower IQ scores and conditions such as autism,
attention deficit disorder, and cerebral palsy.
One in six children is thought to have some kind of
developmental disability,
but the exact causes are largely unknown.
The American and Danish researchers say that lead,
methylmercury, arsenic and solvents such as ethanol and toluene are
among 202 industrial and agricultural chemicals with potential to
damage the brain. But these are likely to be the "tip of a very
large iceberg" of potentially noxious chemicals, they write.
More than 1,000 chemicals are known to be neurotoxic in animals,
and are also likely to be harmful to humans, especially during the
vulnerable phases of development that begin during pregnancy and
can extend as late as the onset of adolesence.
Other substances that could prove to be toxic in excessive
amounts include fluoride, a common additive in drinking water and
toothpaste, the researchers say.
In the EU, 100,000 chemicals were registered for commercial use
in 1981, and in the US, 80,000 are registered. Yet fewer than half
have been subjected to even token laboratory testing, the
researchers say, and in 80 per cent of cases there was no
information about the danger to children.
Although new chemicals are more rigorously tested, access to
data could be restricted for commercial reasons.
The researchers are calling for much tighter worldwide controls
on chemicals, and a "precautionary approach" to testing. In the EU,
a new testing programme called Reach is planned that will enforce
tighter controls. But the scientists say that this does not go far
enough, since it fails to emphasise the importance of testing
chemicals for damage that they may cause to the developing
brain.
Philippe Grandjean, from the University of Southern Denmark in
Winslowparken, who co-wrote the study said: "Only a few substances,
such as lead and mercury, are controlled with the purpose of
protecting children.
"The 200 other chemicals that are known to be toxic to the human
brain are not regulated to prevent adverse effects on the foetus or
a small child."
Dr Grandjean and his co-author, Philip Landrigan, from the Mount
Sinai School of Medicine in New York, trawled a range of scientific
data sources to compile their evidence. Five substances for which
sufficient toxicity evidence exist were examined in detail - lead,
methylmercury, arsenic, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and
toluene.
For example, virtually all children born in industrialised
countries between 1960 and 1980 must have been exposed to lead from
petrol, the researchers say. Based on what is known about lead's
toxic effects, this may have reduced the number of people with IQ
scores of 130 and above by more than half, and increased the number
of those with scores of less than 70.
Other results of lead exposure included shortened attention
span, slowed motor co-ordination and heightened aggressiveness. In
later life, early damage from lead can increase the risk of
Parkinson's and other neurodegenerative diseases.
Pinning down the effects of industrial chemical pollution is
extremely difficult because they may not produce symptoms for
several years or even decades, the scientists say.
Writing in the online version of
The Lancet, the scientists conclude: "The combined evidence
suggests that neurodevelopmental disorders caused by industrial
chemicals has created a silent pandemic in modern society."
Link to story:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/health/article629094.ece
In response to assignment:
Planet in Peril