iReport.com is a user-generated site. That means the stories submitted by users are not edited, fact-checked or screened before they post. Only stories marked "On CNN" have been vetted for use in CNN news coverage. Learn more »
 close
iReport: Unedited. Unfiltered. News. 		Upload Now!
iReports
iReporters
Blog
Map
Home > iReports > Story
Chevron - Ecuador - Court Ruins Chance To Help Ecuador's Poor
Click to view zennie62's profile Posted by: zennie62 // 1 month ago // viewed 129 times
Oakland, California // embed media

As some of
you know, we've been following the Chevron - Ecuador story for some
time now. To recap, the problem is that in the 1960s Texaco produced
oil out of that country and through 1990 and in partnership with the Country of Ecuador .
During that time, there were oil spills and economic damage due to oil
production. Texaco spent $40 million in "environmental remediation"
which is another term for carrying out a cleanup program.


Chevron purchased Texaco in 2001
for 46.3 billion, thus assuming Texaco's work and responsibilities in
Ecuador. By that time, Ecuador's then-new state-owned petroleum
organization Petroecuador assumed responsibility for the oil wells that
were once the product of the partnership. But the problem is that
since that time and through today, oil spills and environmental damage
have continued, but Petroecuador has done nothing to either prevent the occurrence of or clean up what was done.


Meanwhile, the Country of Ecuador has moved to work on three fronts:


1) Nationalize the oil industry via Petroecuador
2) Kick out American oil companies like Occidental Petroleum and take over their production facilities.
3. Sued Chevron Texaco to get money to pay for environmental damage that their own state-owned oil company, Petroecuador, caused



The
third point is the focus of my blog. Ecuador's suing Chevron to have
them pay the afforementioned damange. To that end, they were assisted
by a lawyer by the name of Steve Donziger, who had been working on the
case as an "American Legal Advisor", but who has also admitted his own
financial ambitions as he could gain $5 billion from a victory .
The lawsuit -- valued at $16.5 billion by one estimate -- has been the
focus of much legal movement. The latest action by Chevron had it file
an appeal to have Ecuador enter into arbitration discussions regarding
the level of liability each party is responsible for. But there's one
large problem.


The appellate court doesn't understand the contractual relationships. It calls Chevron a "third party."


What!?!


When
Chevron purchased Texaco it essentially became Texaco, with all of its
obligations and problems. Thus, it's not a third party. But even with
this fact, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York took the step of ignoring Chevron's claims of being able to pursue {color:#000000} arbitration by seeing it as a "third party" when it's not.
{color:#333333}

The
result of this failure means that Chevron now must seek other legal
tools to get Ecuador to pay its fair share, but the other problem is
more sinister: Ecuador's rich continue to cover-up their behavior and
irresponsibility toward that country's poorest people. Making it look
like it was just Chevron's fault does not erase the fact that Ecuador
has been harming its poorest people.


The
bottom line here is that just because a firm's an oil company does not
mean it should be treated unfairly, especially when the lives of the
poor of Ecuador are at stake. Chevron / Texaco has paid and does its
share; the Country of Ecuador, which by the way will never give Chevron
a fair trial, has not done so.

Tags: ireport_for_cnn
In response to assignment: iReport for CNN
Average Rating (0)
E-mail to a friendE-mail this story | Share
Log in to report violation
Download this file
Log in to Comment Comments