If you vote, you can't complain
October 31, 2008 | Los Angeles, California | Vetting explained
Donna Brazile, Democratic strategist, is not very good at thinking clearly. On the CNN.com site, she has an editorial where she claims, "You're not allowed to complain if you don't vote, and if you're anything like me, it would be impossible to stay silent for four years."
...and that's it. She says nothing, absolutely nothing, to support this claim. She just leaves it as an unsupported assertion.
Well, I think I should take this opportunity to explain why she is absolutely wrong.
If you don't vote, then you are saying that you don't support the democratic process, nor the leader who gets elected. So in fact by not voting you do have a right to complain, because you are being forced into a system of rule that you did not consent to.
However, if you do vote, then you are consenting to the electoral process, which is merely a popularity contest, and by voting you are conceding to allow the most popular candidate to rule over you, even if you voted for the other guy.
So logically, only if you vote do you lose your right to complain. And only by not voting do you retain your right to object to the outcome.
One other thing I want to mention: Donna says that not voting is equivalent to staying silent for four years. This, also, is completely backwards. If you cast a vote, then you are consenting to the outcome of the election regardless of what that outcome is. You are essentially silencing yourself and supporting the status quo.
However, a low voter turnout is well-known by politicians themselves to be sending a louder, stronger message than any vote that is actually cast. Politicians are always trying to obscure this fact by equating voting with "making your voice heard," but the truth is that the politicians want you to get in line and comply and not speak up, and that is why they want you to vote. Nothing sends a clearer message, or embarrasses the government more, than a low voter turnout. The last thing the government wants is a non-vote, because a non-vote says to the government, "I am not happy with the choices you offer, nor the system you want me to participate in."
What louder message and what louder complaint can you make than that?
So if you like being the silent majority, if you like the way things are, if you like the status quo, then line up like sheep to be shorn in the polling booths. But if you want to complain, if you want to make some noise, if you want to let the politicians know that you do not approve of their actions, then don't vote.
- Tags:
- ireport_for_cnn,
- donna,
- brazile,
- do_not_vote,
- voting,
- vote,
- election08,
- complain,
- status,
- quo
- Posted in Assignment:
- iReport for CNN
iReport welcomes a lively discussion, so comments on iReports are not pre-screened before they post. See the iReport community guidelines for details about content that is not welcome on iReport.
What is iReport?
-
Share
Tell a story, offer an opinion, say what's important to you.
-
Discuss
Join the conversation on the day's big issues.
-
Be heard
The best iReports get vetted and used on CNN platforms.
The label “Not vetted by CNN” lets you know that this story hasn’t been both checked and cleared by a CNN editor.
iReport stories that have a red "CNN iReport" stamp in the corner have been vetted and
cleared. That means they've been selected and approved by a CNN producer to use on CNN,
on air, or on any of CNN's platforms.







Comments