Another Georgian Ambassador blames Saakashvili for August war. 4 videos
February 21, 2009 | New York City | Vetting explained
Russia Seeks Inquiry Into Monitors' Account of Georgia War
By ELLEN BARRY MOSCOW - Russia has asked the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe for an inquiry into the accounts of military observers stationed in the South Ossetian separatist capital of Tskhinvali on the night of Aug. 7, when it was shelled by Georgian forces. An article in The New York Times on Nov. 7 described newly available accounts by three monitors working in Tskhinvali for the O.S.C.E., a multilateral organization that has monitored the conflict in Georgia since the 1990s. The article detailed observations by the monitors, shared with diplomats at two confidential briefings, which suggested that Georgia had attacked the city with indiscriminate artillery and rocket fire. The article also reported that the monitors were unable to verify heavy bombardment of Georgian villages on the night of Aug. 7, a main justification for the Georgian attack. Georgian officials have contested the account, while the Kremlin has embraced it. The Finnish foreign minister, Alexander Stubb, said Wednesday that he would cooperate with the Russian request and a Swiss-led European Union investigation into the war's origins, but he added that the small Tskhinvali detachment could shed little light on the question. "It's not my job to make a judgment of who started the war," he said at a news conference in Moscow, a day after meeting with his Russian counterpart, Sergey V. Lavrov. "The O.S.C.E. is not an intelligence service," he added. "I find the debate very surreal. Our instruments are very limited - eight unarmed military observers, compared to the intelligence services of the rest of the world." He said that throughout the war, the organization's records - daily "spot reports" and his own official statements - were shared with the O.S.C.E.'s member states, including Russia. The conflict in Georgia, which brought Russia into tense confrontation with the West, had been simmering for days before Aug. 7. Georgia has said it carried out the attack because a Russian invasion was under way, but Western intelligence agencies have not been able to confirm that account. The Georgian government has been calling for an impartial investigation of the war's outbreak since August, saying it would reveal a Russian military buildup and attacks on Georgian settlements. "Things have not started on the seventh, and it is clear to anyone who is familiar with the matter," said Giga Bokeria, Georgia's deputy foreign minister. "We hope the commission will look at the issues and we certainly hope Russia will be made to be open, as we are ready to be, with the commission." The O.S.C.E. monitors' account is significant because the three monitors - a Finnish major, a Belarussian airborne captain and a Polish civilian - were the only impartial military observers on the battlefield. Mr. Lavrov said Tuesday that Russia was "very much interested in finding the truth about what the O.S.C.E. observers say, what they reported and to whom those reports were presented." He added: "We are not trying to accuse anyone of anything. We are very far from this thought. However, taking into account continuous ‘leaks' to the media on this subject, we have raised a question in the permanent O.S.C.E. council in Vienna asking to clarify it." Since the war's end, Russia and the security organization have been at odds about allowing monitors to return to South Ossetia. The O.S.C.E. has a mandate for eight observers to return, but they have not been allowed to enter the enclave, Mr. Stubb said.- Posted in Assignment:
- iReport for CNN
iReport welcomes a lively discussion, so comments on iReports are not pre-screened before they post. See the iReport community guidelines for details about content that is not welcome on iReport.
What is iReport?
-
Share
Tell a story, offer an opinion, say what's important to you.
-
Discuss
Join the conversation on the day's big issues.
-
Be heard
The best iReports get vetted and used on CNN platforms.
The label “Not vetted by CNN” lets you know that this story hasn’t been both checked and cleared by a CNN editor.
iReport stories that have a red "CNN iReport" stamp in the corner have been vetted and
cleared. That means they've been selected and approved by a CNN producer to use on CNN,
on air, or on any of CNN's platforms.







Comments