Don't Take My Guns; Take Theirs Instead!
April 18, 2009 | Jersey Shore, New Jersey | Vetting explained
Has anyone else noticed the dichotomy of those who loudly oppose gun control, yet scream about controlling the proliferation of nukes in the hands of nations like Iran and North Korea. Why is it that they do not apply the same reasoning to these nations. The right to protect oneself is universal. I personally don't call it a good idea for these countries to have these weapons, but I can see what might be their motivation for wanting them. It might be that having a nuclear Iran might actually bring stability to the region. Remember the only nation to have ever used the bomb in an act of aggression is the US.
The moment a nation has these weapons they are automatically catapulted into the forefront of world power. They also become impervious to invasion by other nations. In fact, the rest of the world has to sit down and include them in talks about international security. It's very similar to owning guns. Isn't it?
- Tags:
- opinion,
- israel,
- comment,
- ireport_for_cnn,
- debate,
- sound_off,
- mideast,
- gun_control,
- oldschool61
- Posted in Assignment:
- Time for gun control?
iReport welcomes a lively discussion, so comments on iReports are not pre-screened before they post. See the iReport community guidelines for details about content that is not welcome on iReport.
What is iReport?
-
Share
Tell a story, offer an opinion, say what's important to you.
-
Discuss
Join the conversation on the day's big issues.
-
Be heard
The best iReports get vetted and used on CNN platforms.
The label “Not vetted by CNN” lets you know that this story hasn’t been both checked and cleared by a CNN editor.
iReport stories that have a red "CNN iReport" stamp in the corner have been vetted and
cleared. That means they've been selected and approved by a CNN producer to use on CNN,
on air, or on any of CNN's platforms.







Comments