Should U.S. Interfere in Pakistan ? Hell Ya !!

April 20, 2009 | Vetting explained

Viewed 10,779 times
Shared 11 times
Last updated: April 20, 2009

iReport —

U.S. Should interfere in the inner workings of Pakistan because the current Pakistani government or the so called defacto ruler ( the Pakistan Army) has their heads in the sand and lack the political will to tackle the growing Taliban hold on Pakistan. U.S. can't afford for Taliban to grow their power in that region of the world. Even at the cost of strengthening anti American sentiment in that region, U.S. must take all necessary actions to curtail Pakistan from becoming a failed state. It should provide ALL necessary economic and Military aid to the right leadership in Pakistan who is willing to tackle the Taliban problem head on. Now that kind of U.S. interference is long overdue.

Posted in Assignment:
Sound-off

Share this on:

del.icio.us

StumbleUpon

Comments

iReport welcomes a lively discussion, so comments on iReports are not pre-screened before they post. See the iReport community guidelines for details about content that is not welcome on iReport.

What is iReport?

Share

Tell a story, offer an opinion, say what's important to you.
Discuss

Join the conversation on the day's big issues.
Be heard

The best iReports get vetted and used on CNN platforms.

iReport is a user-generated section of CNN.com. The stories here come from users. CNN has vetted only the stories marked with the "CNN" badge. MORE...

CNN iReport