Please do not prosecute for Interrogations....my view
April 21, 2009 | Brooklyn, New York | Vetting explained
So far I have supported the majority of Obama Administration policies. This is one policy I can not support. We can not under any circumstances start to prosecute military members officer or enlisted for following direct orders. The problem with this is very clear. If we go after these people who followed orders they where directly given by their superiors then we will have a military full of members who will question orders all the time.
In order to have and maintain control in the military we can not have members who are in fear of carrying out a direct order.
Please do not change course and prosecute members of the governement who followed orders. Prosecute those that issued the order from the top down, if they broke the law.
I am truly undecided as to how much real and legitimate information we recieved from these interrogations.
www.twitter.com/integritynews
Follow Integritynews on twitter
www.integrityforamerica.org
- Tags:
- sound_off,
- interrogation,
- opinion,
- prosecution,
- bush,
- military,
- comment,
- obama
- Posted in Assignment:
- Sound Off
iReport welcomes a lively discussion, so comments on iReports are not pre-screened before they post. See the iReport community guidelines for details about content that is not welcome on iReport.
What is iReport?
-
Share
Tell a story, offer an opinion, say what's important to you.
-
Discuss
Join the conversation on the day's big issues.
-
Be heard
The best iReports get vetted and used on CNN platforms.
The label “Not vetted by CNN” lets you know that this story hasn’t been both checked and cleared by a CNN editor.
iReport stories that have a red "CNN iReport" stamp in the corner have been vetted and
cleared. That means they've been selected and approved by a CNN producer to use on CNN,
on air, or on any of CNN's platforms.








Comments