So is it okay to waterboard a US Soldier 180 times in a month?
April 22, 2009 | Altadena, California | Vetting explained
I was so wrong about torture. Since the Liks of Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck, and anyone else on the right think it's not torture when you're waterboarded, and it's just rough interrogation tactics, then they must think it's perfectly okay when our soldiers are captured and they're waterboarded.
I'd like to see them say it's not torture when a news report breaks on Private Joe Smith, from Anytown, USA, was found to have been waterboarded 183 times over a period of 30 days.
Who else thinks it would be okay if one of our American Soldiers was found to have been waterboarded that many times? Who else can say that he would be a perfectly normal man, with no damaged psychological issues after believing he would be drowned nearly 200 times.
Remember, they thinks it's okay to Waterboard US Troops!!
- Posted in Assignment:
- Sound Off
iReport welcomes a lively discussion, so comments on iReports are not pre-screened before they post. See the iReport community guidelines for details about content that is not welcome on iReport.
What is iReport?
-
Share
Tell a story, offer an opinion, say what's important to you.
-
Discuss
Join the conversation on the day's big issues.
-
Be heard
The best iReports get vetted and used on CNN platforms.
The label “Not vetted by CNN” lets you know that this story hasn’t been both checked and cleared by a CNN editor.
iReport stories that have a red "CNN iReport" stamp in the corner have been vetted and
cleared. That means they've been selected and approved by a CNN producer to use on CNN,
on air, or on any of CNN's platforms.







Comments