Supreme Court rules against networks on indecent speech
April 28, 2009 | Foster City, California | Vetting explained
Just when you thought the FACIST bush people are gone here come a reminder
Yes I am a pinko commie liberal if you think I’m going to let the Supreme Court censor free speech.
Why is it right-wing-nut jobs have to dictate to the world their beliefs and it doesn’t matter whose rights they trample on.
The don’t have enough sense to get out of the rain unless directed and they are usually the most blatant abusers of all these so call moral superiority crap they try and shove down peoples throats.
Their self-righteousness is blinded by the fact only they know what is best for you.
Why can’t they turn the channel or keep the damn thing off since nothing is acceptable to them.
I’m odd though because when I see something I don’t like I don’t think hey let me dictate to the world my beliefs I just turn the F@^King channel.
I did that because the children have never heard anything like that on the streets.
How many rights much you lose before you say enough is enough.
iReport welcomes a lively discussion, so comments on iReports are not pre-screened before they post. See the iReport community guidelines for details about content that is not welcome on iReport.
What is iReport?
-
Share
Tell a story, offer an opinion, say what's important to you.
-
Discuss
Join the conversation on the day's big issues.
-
Be heard
The best iReports get vetted and used on CNN platforms.
The label “Not vetted by CNN” lets you know that this story hasn’t been both checked and cleared by a CNN editor.
iReport stories that have a red "CNN iReport" stamp in the corner have been vetted and
cleared. That means they've been selected and approved by a CNN producer to use on CNN,
on air, or on any of CNN's platforms.







Comments