CNN iReport CNN iReport

Marriage no - civil union yes

May 27, 2009 | Vetting explained

rodger2 Posted by:
rodger2

  • Viewed 127 times
 
iReport —

The government has the responsibility to uphold contracts between businesses and individuals.  They can also determine who can and cannot enter into a contract – for instance anyone under 18 years of age and convicted felons.  It is a horrendous mistake for the government to deny contracts based on sex if the individual is considered an adult!   When two people want to live together and share their lives together, they enter into a civil union contract.  The government has required that all marriages contain a civil union contract.  But a Marriage is a religious entity not a government entity.   We confuse the two because the government REQUIRES the civil union be a part of any marriage union, but the two things are very different.  If the government wants to control the English vocabulary and declare a marriage as between two individuals of different sexes, then they are getting into the definition of religion and there is supposed to be a specific separation of church and state.   It is illegal for the government to establish laws governing religion.  It should also be illegal for them to declare that a legal contract between two individuals cannot be established based on sex.  Therefore, nothing should be hindering two individuals of the same sex entering into a civil union and the government must uphold that legal document.  The government should not be able to require a civil union be a part of a “marriage” since marriage is a religious entity.  Once two people have a civil union the government is required to defend that couple’s rights to inheritance and medical records and all the other aspects given to a “married” couple.  With the passing of the Equal Rights Amendment by three more states it will be established in the constitution as the 28th amendment.  It will then be illegal to keep civil unions from people of the same sex. California has already ratified the ERA and the supreme court of that state should be required to uphold civil unions between anyone of adult age!!!  Almost the enitre block of southern states has refused to ratify the ERA!

Comments

Log in to comment

iReport welcomes a lively discussion, so comments on iReports are not pre-screened before they post. See the iReport community guidelines for details about content that is not welcome on iReport.

What is iReport?

  • Share

    Tell a story, offer an opinion, say what's important to you.

  • Discuss

    Join the conversation on the day's big issues.

  • Be heard

    The best iReports get vetted and used on CNN platforms.

iReport is a user-generated section of CNN.com. The stories here come from users. CNN has vetted only the stories marked with the "CNN" badge. MORE...