BROWN FACE = MISTRUST, THE REAL REASON PARENTS DIDN'T WANT OBAMA TO SPEAK TO THEIR KIDS
September 8, 2009 | Washington, District of Columbia | Vetting explained
In a nutshell, a brown face still, in this day and age, = mistrust. This is the real reason why the outraged parents did not want Obama to speak to their kids. They know it, I know it, and you know it. How? Because there was no revolt when George Bush, Sr. and George Bush, Jr. spoke to children. So what else could it be but the mistrust of a "brown face" in authority. "How dare this Black man (even though he's bi-racial; black/white) tell our children what to do!" Is this the America you thought it was? Maybe it really is. One crazy woman even went so far as to pull her kid out of the school he was attending altogether rather than taking him to the library as the principal suggested she do until the speech was over. Had Obama been blonde and blue eyed, as so many of these parent protesters are/were, it would have been a different story and more than likely they would not have protested. Sad day in America...we are still not the progressive country everyone thinks we are. Seems maybe we are a "Superpower" in military only?!
- Posted in Assignment:
- Reaction to Obama education speech
iReport welcomes a lively discussion, so comments on iReports are not pre-screened before they post. See the iReport community guidelines for details about content that is not welcome on iReport.
What is iReport?
-
Share
Tell a story, offer an opinion, say what's important to you.
-
Discuss
Join the conversation on the day's big issues.
-
Be heard
The best iReports get vetted and used on CNN platforms.
The label “Not vetted by CNN” lets you know that this story hasn’t been both checked and cleared by a CNN editor.
iReport stories that have a red "CNN iReport" stamp in the corner have been vetted and
cleared. That means they've been selected and approved by a CNN producer to use on CNN,
on air, or on any of CNN's platforms.







Comments