President Obama's Attack on Fox News Illegal
October 20, 2009 | Chicago, Illinois | Vetting explained
By the legal definition of collusion one can say the Obama Administration is breaking the law through its actions working with other news networks to isolate and marginalize Fox News. By the legal definition, collusion occurs when two persons or representatives of an entity or organization make an agreement (Obama & News Networks) to gain an unfair advantage over a third party (Fox News).
Whether this is true in the literal legal sense it is truly scary that the administration of the United States of America is working with other organizations to attack and diminish another free enterprise in our country, not too mention what it says about government controlling the media, free speech and the promise of more transparency in government?
Now that the precedent has been set, this raises the question of whether the next republican president of the United States will choose to go after news organizations they don’t agree with (MSNBC)? Where will it stop?
Is this the beginning of the end of the free press in the United States?
- Tags:
- msnbc,
- free_press,
- fox,
- illegal,
- obama,
- president,
- freedom_of_speech,
- cnn,
- law,
- collusion
- Posted in Assignment:
- Breaking news
iReport welcomes a lively discussion, so comments on iReports are not pre-screened before they post. See the iReport community guidelines for details about content that is not welcome on iReport.
What is iReport?
-
Share
Tell a story, offer an opinion, say what's important to you.
-
Discuss
Join the conversation on the day's big issues.
-
Be heard
The best iReports get vetted and used on CNN platforms.
The label “Not vetted by CNN” lets you know that this story hasn’t been both checked and cleared by a CNN editor.
iReport stories that have a red "CNN iReport" stamp in the corner have been vetted and
cleared. That means they've been selected and approved by a CNN producer to use on CNN,
on air, or on any of CNN's platforms.







Comments