The Democrats are mindlessly destroying their brand
February 9, 2010 | Dallas, Texas | Vetting explained
(Response to Presidents Obama press briefing today, specifically the part on health care reform)
The Democratic party cannot help but lose seats. That is cyclical, and historically unavoidable during a recession and when tackling controversial issues such as health care.
What President Obama should impress upon on the Democratic party is that they cannot choose whether to lose seats or not, but they can decide the terms on which they do so.
This is about long term brand building. Will the party be remembered for historical reform and, subsequently, be able to run on this in the future, or will they be remembered as the party that got nothing accomplished?
If the party loses in 2010, it will lose for one of two reasons: because it was bold, or because it was ineffective. Either way, the very outcome will determine its chances in 2012!
- Tags:
- health_care,
- reform,
- insurance
- Posted in Assignment:
- Health care reform: The final push?
iReport welcomes a lively discussion, so comments on iReports are not pre-screened before they post. See the iReport community guidelines for details about content that is not welcome on iReport.
What is iReport?
-
Share
Tell a story, offer an opinion, say what's important to you.
-
Discuss
Join the conversation on the day's big issues.
-
Be heard
The best iReports get vetted and used on CNN platforms.
The label “Not vetted by CNN” lets you know that this story hasn’t been both checked and cleared by a CNN editor.
iReport stories that have a red "CNN iReport" stamp in the corner have been vetted and
cleared. That means they've been selected and approved by a CNN producer to use on CNN,
on air, or on any of CNN's platforms.






Comments