When we were invited to go see Hancock last night by one of my
husband's friends, I was excited. It's a close shoutout to my
maiden name and I'm a Will Smith fan (yes, he's on my "list") so I
was excited about watching him wow the big screen yet again in what
I assumed would be a great summer movie. I'm not really the type to
typically enjoy superhero flicks, but I've seen two or three that
I've enjoyed, and we weren't paying, so off we went. The results
were astounding, and not completely in a good way.
The movie was tame enough for the first hour or so. For all
intents and purposes, it seems that Hancock is a laid-back
superhero who, instead of being the much-lauded savior of LA, is a
homeless alcoholic who only saves those in need out of some twisted
sense of duty. He is sarcastic, flippant, and reluctant to admit
any sort of real humanity. He appears to be "just another guy" who
couldn't care less about himself but is willing to sacrifice
himself for the good of others. Oh, yeah, and he can walk through
bullets. We're introduced to Ray, an overachieving dad who wants to
change the world one way or the other, and sees his means in the
disgruntled Hancock, who is obviously in need of Ray's PR skills.
Hancock kicks some evildoer butt (although we're never really
introduced to any one, definitive, eviler-than-thou villain), saves
a couple of people (including Ray, which is how they meet), and
everything is going smoothly.
*
Warning: here be spoilers! If you haven't seen the movie, you
may consider stopping here. *
Now, let me preface this part by stating very clearly that I
do
not mind plot twists. In fact, I'm a fan of them: I'd rather
be thrown a curveball I never saw coming than know that I'm going
to be getting a bunch of lobbed-in pitches every single time. I
don't mind veering left instead of constantly going straight. I
like twists.
However, I
do have a problem - a rather big one, in fact - with going
from "straight and narrow" to "spin out into a right turn at 90 mph
without bothering to slow down when you aren't wearing a seatbelt."
Sadly, this is exactly what Hancock does.
Yes, this does prevent the movie from being some kind of
predictable feel-good superhero-movie-gone-chick-flick. But half an
hour before wrapup, we're introduced to new plots that are so far
out of left field it isn't funny, and worse yet, they make no
sense. We're given some insight as to Hancock's past, but we also
find an unexpected - and confusing - connection between he and
Mary, Ray's wife. The audience is thrown through a loop with the
sudden realization that this is no longer a superhero movie, but
the reconciliation of eternally tortured immortals who are
apparently referred to as whatever is convenient for the society in
question (be it "superhero" or "God's angels"). There's death,
there's rebirth, there's love lost (that spent the entire movie
being unknown anyway). And there isn't time for the audience to
catch their breath and ask, "What the *&$%?"
This is not a Will Smith movie. There is no believable
supervillain, no real backstory to explain our hated hero. The
ending leads me to believe that one morning Mr. Smith woke up, got
drunk, and decided that it would be
really awesome to make a movie where he got to fly and oh,
at the end? Yeah, he and Charlize Theron should totally want each
other. That would be great. As a superhero movie, it's lackluster
at best, but if you go in expecting nothing, you'll certainly come
out with more than you anticipated. Just watch out for those tight
corners.
In response to assignment:
iReport at the movies