Does it worry you, Senator John McCain: that the position of President is always filled by a member of a party?
Why would this worry you: because what is the reflection created of the American people when no well respected individuals found in the private market would have the care to take up the position due to the expected loss of annual revenue; does is suggest that the existence of the parties would just outright deny these private citizens anyway, or does it suggest that those respected individuals already have a closet so full of shame they will not even seriously consider running.

Is their something wrong with the moral fiber of America when it can not produce an independent individual not only with the required level of public recognition, but also an intact conscience, and the philanthropic spirit required to accept the limited salary of the President and who still could not be persuaded or duped to corruption-gate for additional profits?

Can anyone in any of the parties even defend the party system when confined to the pages of the Constitution?

With the oath of office subverted by the first Party--with the Oval Office, the Senate, Congress, and even the States now overrun and overruled by these parties so subverting the expectations of separation and the due process of government oversight--and with so many other violations committed to and the shear ignorance of the Constitution: what do you predict as the next expected corruption to government? Maybe Congress or the individual States will be completely striped of all powers by acts and policies, or the parties will all internally self nominate so to deny real public involvement thus controlling or privately electing only those the 'permanent party staff' knows it can manipulate and control, or maybe the parties will unite to oppress the independent though of the youth of the United States of America and with a massive initiative of confusion and with an abuse of authority so force the party method upon those youth within the walls and under the guise of public institutions...
Why hasn't an amendment been passed since 1933? Amendments are the required writs of law for taxation with representation, and since the United States Dollar is not a public purchased commodity to allow the federation a gainful profit: how does the federation justify and pay for NASA and many other of the departments... not that NASA is not needed but taxation must only accompany the commerce of services and stocks; taxation puts forward the idea of a manditory service provided by a government department, put in place on the behalf of all the people by those elected, and afforded as the final price of service or sale.
What is the difference of a party and policy when taken in comparison to the Crown?