THE ENERGY WARS |
ADDICTED TO OIL, SOMETHING WE DO NOT PRODUCE!
FORT LAUDERDALE | FLORIDA-USA
In 1944 the US was only importing 16% of the oil it needed. But
in 1950 the US was already depended on the oil from a fragile area
of the globe: the Middle East. It important with more than 58% of
the economy needs on crude. Today US imports 60% of the its
necessity and burns some 21 million gallons a day, 1/3 of the world
crude production.
In 2006, in his State-OF-The-Union speech to Congress, the
president G.W. Bush warned us*: "
We are addicted to oil!"*
The energy crisis we are passing thru is bigger than the WWI.
This is the reason that it will take time to built the logistics,
political will and the technology base needed to end our dependency
on fossil fuel and to win this WAR ON ENERGY!
Wrong decision. Many decades ago the Western countries
make a wrong decision: to base their economic growth on engines
using fossil oil, at that time very cheap and abundant. India,
China, Asia, were just marginal and forgotten, labeled "third world
markets". If we do not find, fast, another sources of energy, to
fossil oil and natural gas, this will lead regional wars with
China, Russia, India, or other big emerging markets.
The Brazilian Example.
We all have to study this case. It has to be example the world
should follow, with flavors developed by each country. The decision
taken during the crisis of the Yom Kippur war of 1973, not to
depend on fossil fuel as the primary source of energy, propelled
this country from a tourist destination to an economical giant.
Since my last report in March, 2008the gas and fuel just went
into one direction: forward. The speed of the price increase is
fast-constant
(steady 1/3 forward) and we are over a historical mark and
maybe psychological threshold:
the $4.00 for the unleaded gallon. (Correction: already
there as of May 21st, 2008). The web is full with of fuel board
prices photos...and will keep coming and being posted in big
numbers as consumers are coming to age with high prices and try to
adjust so many (too many...) limited budgets.
In August 2008, the crude prices have receded form a $148.00
all -time record mark and are in the $100 range. The consumption is
reduced, and a totally
new reality started to dominate the economy, the politics,
the society and the consumers. The average price for unleaded, as
you can see it at the pomp (in many places), is below $4.00/gallon.
Sure, some will argue, Brazil has some unique advantages,
with vast geographical areas, tropical climate, big crops and a
coherent political will. But this case can be repeated in many
other countries around the world.
We're record breakers every day! In Chicago or California you
can buy the most expensive gasoline, with about $0.30 more than
average rest of the country. (As of May 25th, 2008)
The myth: the oil is not unlimited. Every day is harder
to be found and harvested. More and more, companies have to go to
frigid areas or deep marine platforms to find the crude. In the
summer of 2007, the crude oil prices were around $60.00 a barrel.
Now the price is roaming around $130-140. The oil production is
closed or have already picked. Slowly-slowly will be scarce raw
material to be found. A simple strike in Nigeria, a kidnapping, a
political rally in Venezuela, an small accident, a terrorist attack
in the Middle East, aggressive political attitudes in Russia,
Iranian mines in the Hormuz Canal, can boost the prices high in the
skies.
Can we have any illusions
: in many places all over U.S. the price of the unleaded
gallon (the cheap gasoline flavor) is well over $4.15, but the
industry mark is the U.S. Average Price. From a crude oil price at
the tanker hose, (now the petroleum is at $135.00/barrel) about
80-85% is reflected at the pumps consumer price, the rest being
made by federal taxes, local taxes, distribution costs and pump
owners/operators mark-ups.
Who is to blame
: *Only us, the consumers*!? Long time ago, we did not
demanded better fuel efficient engine/vehicles as in Europe, or
alternate fuels. This reform is long time ago over-due, and should
have started at least after the big crisis of 1973. We were
complacent (SIMPLY WE DIDN'T CARE!!!) and now we are paying for
this mistake. Our fuel engines here in U.S. are not efficient and
too big for the vehicles we drive. Too few are Diesel, alcohol or
liquid natural gas powered
U.S. vs Europe
: In Europe the motorists pay about $8.00 a gallon, but
computing the engine efficiency factor (average 4 cyls, .1.3-1.6L +
high compression ratio), we can reach the reference price of $6.5
/gallon.
IN BRITAIN, THE PRICE OF GASOLINE IS WELL OVER $10/GALLON.
STATE & GOVERNMENT TAXES REPRESENT 65% OF THE FUEL PRICE
STRUCTURE. ALREADY THERE ARE SMALL TRUCK DRIVERS RIOTS GENERATED BY
HIGH FUEL PRICES.
I was living in Europe for many years. Sure, the distances
one has to travel are vastly bigger in USA than in Europe. They
have an advanced and superbly designed mass-transit system: in
Bucharest they have double trolley-busses, electrical trams and
electrical locomotives from the 70's. In Central Europe electrical
trains were running before, during and after WWII. Even Porsche
invented and all-wheel-drive electrical car, at the beginning of
the 20th century. Almost 100 years later, the GM is reinventing the
Volt Vehicle! Is this cynical and/or simply stupid energy policy,
so late and so little?
-
Who is to blame*? ONLY US: un-educated and unconcerned
consumers. No cheap solutions or temporary patches have to be
adopted, now, once again.
- Only comprehensive ones, based as well on a massive and well
tuned mass transit system, can be implemented.
On the small individual level we are still better off than
them (the Europeans). *
But for how long*? Our way of living and working is
different, but we live in an interconnected planet.
The US currency.
Another factor and reality to blame is the current value of
the Dollar: lower vs. the Euro and with a different buying power
than some years ago. Some national banks now have to stock as well
large sums fo Euros, in order to buy/pay for the crude oil import
from Venezuela or Iran, this eroding more the paramount power of
the US dollar.
International markets. In the last 50 years, the world
population simply doubled, to more than 8+ billions humans, putting
an enormous pressure on supply, food chains, water, energy and
global geo-politics. More important, the international markets
changed and more and more people (around the world and in the big
emerging markets) have more money and access to buy a pre-owned or
a new vehicle.
Economical speed.
Many decades ago, in Europe, you will have posted a decal with
the most efficient speed for your vehicle, in such a manner to
direct you to drive at that speed and not pas it, in order to save
fuel.
The price hike will continue for many months until a new
source of fuel + new technologies will be introduced and
implemented: like ethanol from sugar cane (and not corn-*corn is
food*!!!), hybrid, liquid natural gas or AWD electrical cars. ths
ethanol program from corn, in usa, backfired, because corn id FOOD
and some ¼ of the US crop yield was destined to produce
ethanol, in a very inefficient way, compared to Brazil, producing 8
times more ethanol from sugar cane. sure, in US, the American
farmers know to produce corn and not sugar cane, and this was the
most wide available raw material at hand...
The price at the pomp is rising in a tempo of about
$0.10-0.17/week, faster than I can update my reports.
Domino effect and/or Snow ball effect.
The first one is a horizontal chain reaction and the other is
escalation to bigger and bigger. Both can describe well what we are
living in right now. But of course we will be in a snow-ball price
effect in our economy, which will alter
all prices from groceries to entertainment and tourism.
Nothing around us will be left out of this high-fuel-price cyclone,
because many decades ago we have based our
way of living on fossil oil, something that we do not
produce at home.
Can we expect a moderation in the oil prices? It will be
difficult to achieve and such a complicated economical
international arena and a "hot" political climate. Possible: yes;
only if the domestic consumption will be down by 25% and U.S. will
achieve oil independence by exploring existing reserves and putting
in the market alternative fuels.
The future. Ferdinand Porsche's one of the first design
was the Lohner-Porsche electric car of 1901. The vehicle was
presented at the Paris Expo. It was avant-garde, and was
enthusiastically received. As technology, was unique for its
hub-mounted motors and innovative all-wheel-drive design.
THE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY will need some time to retool the
equipment, factories and service infrastructure and start
produccion of fuel-efficient vehicles and small cars.
Today, we still drive on fossil fuel powered cars. What a
pity! This is stupid!
Oil, petrol crude, and its chemical derivates broth us from a
medieval society, slowly advancing and mainly based on steam power
to the advanced technological age, but we have to let go the fossil
fuel for atomic, wind, solar and other forms of energy. Burning
fossil fuels is not ecological-friendly!
I estimate, at some time in the short future, that the
pressure on economy (energy and food), local and global, will lead
to profound political changes that will simply switch from fossil
fuels based energy to hydro, natural gas, solar and atomic energy.
We have to face not only a new economic reality, but a social
one, with high energy prices that affect simply all the level of
our complicated society. We have to be aware that crude era will be
only a passing thru phase, intermediate, and not representing the
future. WE HAVE TO ADAPT, IN ORDER TO SURVIVE AND MOVE FORWARD.
ADJUSTING TO THE CONSUMER'S NEEDS AND NEW ENERGY/FUELS TYPES IS
NOT ALWAYS A FAST PROCESS. This transition will take from 18 to
24 work-time months (in my opinion) and can be considered as a war,
when the enemy have the advantage of a new weapon and one have to
adapt and find counter-measures and new weapons; and by the end of
the day, win the war. This time is the
war on energy.
It's a time of many trials and tests, but some strong
solution, general and cheap to implement will emerge as the
universal standard for the next generation of individual
locomotion.
Fossil fuels locomotion is dead.
U.S. has the technology edge to do it and the industrial
might & the civil + political will to explore new ways to
become and achieve oil/energy independence. Still the
political pressure is not so big for the developers to go
fast & furious to the computer screens (called before, "drawing
tables") and design new ways to save petrol or new types or
propulsion.
We need an
Energy Revolution
to occur, and the minds and hearts (and the pockets...) are
starting to set on one and send the right signals. Simply, the
"pain at the pump" is too big to overcome by so many stained
budgets and a steady 50-60k jobs losing string a month.
Locally produced energy. It is simply a matter of
finding alternative sources of energy, locally. The energy cannot
be imported. It has to be produced, harvested at home, renewable,
clean-burning and in agreement with the environment.
I think that the idea for a change from the fossil fuel is in
march right now (not yet a full march!) It's only a matter of time
until building steam & rolling.
Are we going back to the steam era and animal powered
transportation? SAD, BUT IT'S TRUE. We have the technology to reach
the Moon and Mars and still burn fossil fuel in our inefficient
vehicles.
If we are continuing in this way, the wrong way, burning so
much fossil fuel, we are simply going to run out of gas.
> Anyway, there is no intelligence in burning fossil fuel in
an engine. Oil is better processed and taken advantage (with
improving efficiency and many important derivate products) in the
chemical industry. For transportation, mass energy generation
and local needs, we can use other sources.
IF MY DEAR READER HAS ANY IDEAS ON HOW TO SAVE FUEL &
IMPROVE MILEAGE, PLEASE E-MAIL ME.
Hedi Enghelberg
Mechanical Engineer |
hedi@enghelberg.com
FIRST PUBLISHED ON
http://www.cnn.com/, JULY 2008
In response to assignment:
Pain at the pump