CNN iReport CNN iReport

How the Western Media Lies about victims of "russian bombardment"

August 12, 2008 | . | Vetting explained

Cadavr Posted by:
Cadavr

  • Viewed 811 times
  • Shared 4 times
  • Last updated: August 12, 2008
 
iReport —

1. A corpse that turns over.

At the photo #1 we see a “dead” man, lying on his back. Another man grieving hugs his head and cries – possibly the dead was his relative or friend.

But at the photo #2 we see the same “dead” man in the same clothes, which, being tired of lying on his back has turned over on his stomack to pose for another photo session :-).

We can see by the position of his head that this man has not been killed, indeed this is a hired actor that poses for a photo session imitating a victim.

 

2. “Grieving” ”relative” has not forgotten to change his clothes before a new photo session.

At the photo #3 we see a man screaming something into the camera.

But wait a minute, haven’t we seen him before? Of course, it’s the same “grieving relative” that has screamed so scenic at the photo #1, but in different clothes.

Could you believe that?

His closest relative has just died and he is only thinking about changing clothes before a new photo session!

That’s impossible.

Therefore this photo is a fake too.

 

3. “Boys don’t cry”: “a heavily wounded” teenager remains calm and doesn’t scream while soldiers are carrying him above the “corpse” of a “killed” woman. At the photo #4 we see completely unimaginable events.

 

At first glance it seems that two Georgian soldiers carry a heavily wounded boy.

The boy’s right foot is covered with blood which shows that the wound was heavy and painful.

But look closely to the boy’s face: he is not screaming, his face shows no suffering, no negative emotions.

On the contrary, the boy watches somewhere to the side with interest, squinting right.

By the way the "blood" has flooded richly the boy’s leg but not a single drop of "blood" has got at his white shoes!

Is that possible?

It’s impossible; therefore all listed photos by the news agency “Reuters” are fake.

 

It’s odd, why do “Reuters” call itself a “news agency”?

 

Considering the fact that it likes different “tricks” I would rather call it a “circus agency”.

Comments

Log in to comment

iReport welcomes a lively discussion, so comments on iReports are not pre-screened before they post. See the iReport community guidelines for details about content that is not welcome on iReport.

What is iReport?

  • Share

    Tell a story, offer an opinion, say what's important to you.

  • Discuss

    Join the conversation on the day's big issues.

  • Be heard

    The best iReports get vetted and used on CNN platforms.

iReport is a user-generated section of CNN.com. The stories here come from users. CNN has vetted only the stories marked with the "CNN" badge. MORE...