iReport.com is a user-generated site. That means the stories submitted by users are not edited, fact-checked or screened before they post. Only stories marked "On CNN" have been vetted for use in CNN news coverage. Learn more »
close
iReport: Unedited. Unfiltered. News.
Upload Now!
iReports
iReporters
Blog
Map
Home > iReports > Story
EXPLOSIVE REALITY FOR THE SLICK STREET CRIMINAL'S
Click to view butterfly1's profile Posted by: butterfly1 // 3 months ago // viewed 19 times
embed media

When I read and attempting to digest such a profound news worthy article titled minority Report written by a Rebecca Sato, I didn't believe I could provide our Ireport.com reader's the intelligent prospective it deserved. I knew I was in trouble just trying to related in my words to my dear husband whom was getting bored with the entire conversation. I had my mouth wide open, just say "you must read this for yourself. I couldn't seem to read fast enough and related to him in the wording and describe exactly what I was feeling. Finally, I just said slow down, take your time, try and digest what is this really mean's about the new technology of the world. I came to conclusion I should do everyone the courtesy of just coping for interested reader eyes to read.
The Department of Homeland Security has announced the development of futuristic sounding technology with a bizarre "Minority Report" twist. The criminals they're looking for haven't committed a crime yet.
The program called Project Hostile Intent is part of the Human Factors Division of the DHS. DHS says that they need a way to detect possible "future" terrorists without a criminal past and with no known ties to terrorist organizations and therefore do not appear in any government databases. The technology will use advanced biometric technology in an attempt to "read minds" of people in public places, like airports.
If a computer determines that you are thinking about committing a terrorist act, either imminently, or at some point during your stay in the US, then you will be picked up by security officers for an interview. What is especially creepy about this upcoming program is that since it is specifically targeting people with no known terrorists ties-the only evidence is the "opinion" of a invariably flawed computer program.
The potential for abuse is staggering. Imagine that you get tagged by the computer, and the next thing you know you're dragged off and treated like you were about to blow up an airplane. The only evidence against you would be that a computer deemed that you had some sort of undefined "hostile intent". The fact that you did nothing wrong wouldn't stop you from being detained, interrogated, and harassed. Missing your flight home will be the least of your worries! Some people are becoming more frightened by the governments secretive and vague "war on terror" than they are of terrorist attacks.
The DHS says that with 400 million people entering the country every year, they have to be vigilant in finding individuals who may harbor hostile intent toward the United States. Their ultimate goal is to implement technology that can exceed the abilities of any of today's screening methods-without anyone ever knowing that they're being screened. The project aims to start testing the technology at airports, borders and ports as soon as 2010 and to deploy the system at all points of entry to the US by 2012.
The program manager for Project Hostile Intent, Larry Willis, says that everything is coming along smoothly and soon things are going to change. "The early test results have us cautiously optimistic. This technology has the potential to revolutionize the screening and interviewing process supporting access control for borders and critical infrastructure."
But however successful the program might be at identifying future terrorists, there is something very wrong with preemptively retaining individuals for having a supposed "intent". Is this kind of "pre-emptive" technology seeding a Minority Report future, where harming the innocent is justified as being for the "greater good"? Unless, of course, it could preempted a Cheney & Bush from invading Iraq.
Posted by Rebecca Sato
Butterfly1
In response to assignment: News To Me
Average Rating (2)
E-mail to a friendE-mail this story | Share
Log in to report violation
Log in to Comment Comments