The House Republican's can not see the Forrest for the Trees. In
the rejection of the bailout plan they did not cite problems in the
bill, or give the American people their alternative. And in so
doing missed the greater issue - the stability of the American
economy.
The agreement was half and half, to show responsibility and
to take a real bi-partisan position despite no one being fully
satisfied with the bill. They were putting the Country truly first.
Keep it from crashing now so that we have an economy to work on
recovering. Otherwise we might suffer so great a loss as to not be
able to regain our full strength and stability.
Instead the House Republicans, especially Eric Cantor, cite
their feeling being offended by a speech that Pelosi gave. A speech
were she did point blame but no where near the extent Cantor is
claiming and regardless - why are the Republicans' votes based on
if they're feelings were hurt or not? What about specifics? What
about the people?
I am astounded that the Republicans showed such immaturity as
to blame a speech and a Jewish holiday as reasons for voting
against a compromise that could avert a disaster.
In response to assignment:
Bailout outrage